TER vs. PPT
TER (Teradyne, Inc.) is a stock, while PPT (Putnam Premier Income Trust) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Putnam Investments. Over the past 10 years, TER returned 36.09%/yr vs 4.57%/yr for PPT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TER vs. PPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 108.47% return, which is significantly higher than PPT's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has outperformed PPT with an annualized return of 36.09%, while PPT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.57% annualized return.
TER
- 1D
- 5.72%
- 1M
- 19.38%
- YTD
- 108.47%
- 6M
- 108.68%
- 1Y
- 386.56%
- 3Y*
- 54.13%
- 5Y*
- 26.29%
- 10Y*
- 36.09%
PPT
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 2.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.57%
TER vs. PPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 108.47% | 54.39% | 16.51% | 24.78% | -46.35% | 36.81% | 76.73% | 118.93% | -24.37% | 66.16% |
PPT Putnam Premier Income Trust | 0.81% | 8.39% | 8.80% | 7.43% | -7.75% | -1.72% | -6.54% | 25.53% | -6.36% | 13.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between TER and PPT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 1988 | 0.09 |
The correlation between TER and PPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TER vs. PPT — Risk / Return Rank
TER
PPT
TER vs. PPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TER | PPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.04 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.97 | 0.33 | +13.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.81 | 0.77 | +49.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TER vs. PPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than PPT's maximum drawdown of -49.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and PPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TER | PPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.30% | -49.76% | -47.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.73% | -5.05% | -21.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.18% | -9.10% | -49.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.12% | -18.92% | -40.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.12% | -31.79% | -27.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -3.62% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.67% | -11.23% | -47.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.49% | 2.18% | +5.31% |
Volatility
TER vs. PPT - Volatility Comparison
Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 25.00% compared to Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT) at 2.25%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TER | PPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.00% | 2.25% | +22.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.10% | 6.99% | +46.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.20% | 9.36% | +57.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.20% | 11.96% | +38.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.31% | 14.45% | +30.86% |
Dividends
TER vs. PPT - Dividend Comparison
TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than PPT's 9.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPT Putnam Premier Income Trust | 9.07% | 8.81% | 8.76% | 8.74% | 8.60% | 7.31% | 8.84% | 7.73% | 6.84% | 5.85% | 6.28% | 6.30% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TER and PPT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TER has higher volatility (25.00%) compared to PPT (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs PPT's -49.76%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.56 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TER and PPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer