PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TER vs. LLOY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TER vs. LLOY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLOY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TER is traded in USD, while LLOY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LLOY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 123.58% return, which is significantly higher than LLOY.L's 6.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has outperformed LLOY.L with an annualized return of 37.39%, while LLOY.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.


TER

1D
7.24%
1M
28.03%
YTD
123.58%
6M
122.27%
1Y
421.81%
3Y*
57.92%
5Y*
28.01%
10Y*
37.39%

LLOY.L

1D
0.44%
1M
9.91%
YTD
6.70%
6M
10.87%
1Y
38.12%
3Y*
40.35%
5Y*
21.34%
10Y*
8.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TER vs. LLOY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
123.58%54.39%16.51%24.78%-46.35%36.81%76.73%118.93%-24.37%66.16%
LLOY.L
Lloyds Banking Group plc
6.70%102.54%19.08%16.76%-11.03%33.59%-39.91%32.61%-24.55%21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TER and LLOY.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TER:

$68.16B

LLOY.L:

£60.36B

EPS

TER:

$5.38

LLOY.L:

£0.08

PE Ratio

TER:

80.43

LLOY.L:

12.21

PS Ratio

TER:

18.14

LLOY.L:

3.16

PB Ratio

TER:

21.68

LLOY.L:

1.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

TER:

$3.79B

LLOY.L:

£19.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TER:

$2.23B

LLOY.L:

£19.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

TER:

$1.11B

LLOY.L:

£7.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TER vs. LLOY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TER
TER Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LLOY.L
LLOY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LLOY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLOY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLOY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LLOY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLOY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TER vs. LLOY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLOY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TERLLOY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.24

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.91

1.70

+14.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.72

4.70

+52.03

TER vs. LLOY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TER Sharpe Ratio is 6.31, which is higher than the LLOY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TER and LLOY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TER vs. LLOY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, roughly equal to the maximum LLOY.L drawdown of -94.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and LLOY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TERLLOY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.30%

-94.08%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.73%

-22.28%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.18%

-22.28%

-35.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.12%

-39.53%

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.12%

-66.89%

+7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-32.11%

+32.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.66%

-67.32%

+8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.48%

8.09%

-0.61%

Volatility

TER vs. LLOY.L - Volatility Comparison

Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 25.68% compared to Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLOY.L) at 8.56%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLOY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TERLLOY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.68%

8.56%

+17.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.49%

23.17%

+30.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.51%

30.26%

+37.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.31%

30.04%

+20.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.38%

34.17%

+11.21%

Dividends

TER vs. LLOY.L - Dividend Comparison

TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than LLOY.L's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLOY.L
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.56%3.39%5.29%5.28%4.69%2.59%0.00%5.22%6.02%2.20%2.16%2.05%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
0.12%0.25%0.38%0.41%0.50%0.24%0.33%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.94%1.16%

Financials

TER vs. LLOY.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Lloyds Banking Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
1.28B
5.18B
(TER) Total Revenue
(LLOY.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TER values in USD, LLOY.L values in GBP

TER vs. LLOY.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teradyne, Inc. and Lloyds Banking Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
60.9%
100.0%
Portfolio components
TER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.95M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.

LLOY.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 5.18B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

TER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 473.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.

LLOY.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.

TER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 398.91M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.

LLOY.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TER and LLOY.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TER and LLOY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer