TEQI vs. SPYV
TEQI (T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEQI is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value. TEQI is actively managed, while SPYV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TEQI returned 9.02%/yr vs 10.68%/yr for SPYV. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEQI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
TEQI vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEQI achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return.
TEQI
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
TEQI vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF | 9.71% | 13.36% | 13.14% | 9.64% | -3.33% | 26.25% | 18.07% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 14.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEQI and SPYV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TEQI and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
TEQI vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TEQI
SPYV
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
TEQI
SPYV
Healthcare
TEQI
SPYV
Industrials
TEQI
SPYV
Technology
TEQI
SPYV
Energy
TEQI
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
TEQI
SPYV
Utilities
TEQI
SPYV
Communication Services
TEQI
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
TEQI
SPYV
Real Estate
TEQI
SPYV
Basic Materials
TEQI
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEQI vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
TEQI
SPYV
TEQI vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEQI | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 3.43 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 13.16 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEQI | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.17 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.75 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.42 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
TEQI vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEQI drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQI and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEQI | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.82% | -58.45% | +40.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -6.22% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.85% | -17.54% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -17.89% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -0.57% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -8.72% | +5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 1.62% | +0.40% |
Volatility
TEQI vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that TEQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEQI | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 1.98% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 7.04% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 9.84% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 14.40% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 16.94% | -1.82% |
TEQI vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEQI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEQI vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
TEQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF | 1.55% | 1.71% | 1.86% | 2.12% | 2.32% | 3.03% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TEQI and SPYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TEQI has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQI dropped -17.82% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 5-year performance, SPYV leads with 10.68% vs 9.02% for TEQI. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 10.68% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TEQI.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.55% for TEQI.
TEQI is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TEQI and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEQI and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer