TEMGX vs. UCEQX
Compare and contrast key facts about Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund (TEMGX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX).
TEMGX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 31, 1981. UCEQX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jun 7, 2012.
Performance
TEMGX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEMGX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMGX Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund | -5.26% | 5.43% | 3.42% | 16.62% | -24.00% | 15.06% | 13.23% | 24.50% | -18.10% | 24.94% |
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | -3.55% | 23.71% | 14.50% | 19.36% | -16.25% | 19.68% | 10.76% | 22.49% | -12.06% | 22.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMGX achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's -3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TEMGX has underperformed UCEQX with an annualized return of 5.14%, while UCEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.08% annualized return.
TEMGX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -11.68%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 6.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.90%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
UCEQX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- -3.55%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 19.45%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEMGX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMGX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEMGX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank
TEMGX
UCEQX
TEMGX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund (TEMGX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEMGX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 1.20 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 1.74 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 1.50 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 7.36 | -6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEMGX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 1.20 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.59 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.62 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.62 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMGX and UCEQX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TEMGX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison
TEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than UCEQX's 5.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMGX Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund | 4.95% | 4.69% | 2.98% | 1.09% | 3.14% | 10.66% | 2.58% | 2.16% | 9.12% | 3.65% | 0.33% | 0.21% |
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | 5.26% | 5.08% | 2.56% | 5.10% | 6.80% | 4.61% | 8.25% | 4.79% | 6.73% | 1.91% | 3.16% | 3.63% |
Drawdowns
TEMGX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMGX drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMGX and UCEQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMGX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -35.33% | -33.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -11.75% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.20% | -25.24% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.61% | -35.33% | -6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.71% | -8.96% | -3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -4.92% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 2.40% | +1.58% |
Volatility
TEMGX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund (TEMGX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) at 4.96%. This indicates that TEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEMGX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 4.96% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 9.23% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.49% | 16.40% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 15.17% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 16.44% | +0.79% |