TEK vs. ASMH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TEK (iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TEK is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. Over the past year, TEK returned 30.40% vs 140.25% for ASMH. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

TEK vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEK achieves a 21.44% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 56.41% return.

TEK

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -7.12%
• 6M: 19.04%
• YTD: 21.44%
• 1Y: 30.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.70%

ASMH

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -8.15%
• 6M: 18.92%
• YTD: 56.41%
• 1Y: 140.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 105.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	$131.16K	$380.41K	$302.79K
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF	$171.97K	$226.82K	$208.52K

TEK vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF	21.44%	44.31%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	56.41%	59.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TEK and ASMH is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.68

The correlation between TEK and ASMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TEK vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEK

TEK Risk / Return Rank: 35
TEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
TEK Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TEK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEK vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEK	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	3.14	-2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	3.53	-2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.43	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	6.35	-5.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	23.29	-19.75

TEK vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEK Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEK and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEK vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEK drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEK and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEK	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.24%	-21.52%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.55%	-21.52%	-1.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.72%	-18.35%	+2.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-4.74%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.82%	5.86%	+1.96%

Volatility

TEK vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) at 13.75%. This indicates that TEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEK	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.74%	13.75%	+0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.28%	34.87%	-5.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.18%	43.72%	-10.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.24%	41.65%	-9.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.24%	41.65%	-9.41%

TEK vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEK vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

TEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than ASMH's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.96%	0.19%
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF	1.31%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEK and ASMH in my portfolio?

TEK and ASMH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEK or ASMH?

TEK has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to ASMH (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEK dropped -28.24% vs ASMH's -21.52%.

Which ETF is better, TEK or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 140.25% vs 30.40% for TEK. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ASMH has been the lower-risk option at 13.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEK or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 140.25% return vs 30.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEK or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEK or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.31% for TEK.

What is the main difference between TEK and ASMH?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TEK and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.