PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEFQX vs. STK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEFQX vs. STK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund (TEFQX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEFQX achieves a 22.36% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 59.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TEFQX has underperformed STK with an annualized return of 7.46%, while STK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.60% annualized return.


TEFQX

1D
2.73%
1M
15.33%
YTD
22.36%
6M
22.86%
1Y
33.78%
3Y*
9.92%
5Y*
-13.00%
10Y*
7.46%

STK

1D
-0.19%
1M
17.70%
YTD
59.80%
6M
57.03%
1Y
116.50%
3Y*
37.51%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
24.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEFQX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEFQX
Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund
22.36%29.82%-22.02%10.81%-60.11%-16.48%97.04%28.50%4.31%55.45%
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
59.80%24.85%17.74%46.60%-30.36%48.63%25.39%52.73%-14.91%33.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TEFQX and STK is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2009

0.58

The correlation between TEFQX and STK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEFQX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEFQX
TEFQX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TEFQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEFQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEFQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TEFQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEFQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

STK
STK Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEFQX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund (TEFQX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEFQXSTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.80

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

9.12

-7.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

38.55

-35.34

TEFQX vs. STK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEFQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the STK Sharpe Ratio of 5.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEFQX and STK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEFQXSTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

5.11

-4.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.88

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.94

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.76

-0.74

Drawdowns

TEFQX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEFQX drawdown since its inception was -92.33%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEFQX and STK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEFQXSTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.33%

-41.74%

-50.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.26%

-12.84%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.62%

-26.59%

-35.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.25%

-36.27%

-42.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.17%

-41.74%

-38.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.10%

-0.19%

-61.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.12%

-7.41%

-52.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.26%

3.03%

+8.23%

Volatility

TEFQX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison

Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund (TEFQX) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) at 8.47%. This indicates that TEFQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEFQXSTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.50%

8.47%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.66%

18.91%

+6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.32%

22.93%

+10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.97%

25.10%

+48.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.44%

26.13%

+29.31%

TEFQX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEFQX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEFQX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison

TEFQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
4.72%7.38%16.02%6.70%12.62%8.48%6.79%7.86%14.88%11.82%9.87%10.32%
TEFQX
Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.91%54.72%6.88%15.27%5.54%0.00%0.00%27.74%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEFQX and STK have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEFQX has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to STK (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEFQX dropped -92.33% vs STK's -41.74%.

STK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEFQX and STK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer