TECY vs. PBP

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

TECY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TECY is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TECY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.

Performance

TECY vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF (TECY) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TECY

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: -3.78%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PBP

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.76%
• 6M: 6.33%
• YTD: 7.12%
• 1Y: 18.24%
• 3Y*: 11.80%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 7.19%
• ALL TIME*: 5.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECY vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TECY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF	-3.54%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TECY and PBP is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026	0.50

Return for Risk

TECY vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 92
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECY vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF (TECY) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TECY	PBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.54	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.67	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.54	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.51	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.08	—

Drawdowns

TECY vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECY drawdown since its inception was -6.82%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECY and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TECY	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	-43.43%	+36.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.22%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.48%	-0.14%	-6.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.60%	-6.65%	+4.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TECY	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.64%	7.23%	+8.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.64%	11.84%	+3.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.64%	13.66%	+1.98%

TECY vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

TECY vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

TECY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, less than PBP's 11.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.98%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%
TECY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF	11.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TECY and PBP in my portfolio?

TECY and PBP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TECY or PBP?

On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TECY or PBP?

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TECY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TECY or PBP?

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.98%, compared with 11.46% for TECY.

What is the main difference between TECY and PBP?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TECY and 0.29% for PBP.