TECY vs. ARMW
TECY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TECY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
TECY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TECY
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -45.07%
- 6M
- 183.64%
- YTD
- 172.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TECY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TECY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF | -3.54% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 34.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TECY and ARMW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TECY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF (TECY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TECY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TECY drawdown since its inception was -6.82%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECY and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TECY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -48.47% | +41.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -45.07% | +38.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -26.17% | +23.57% |
Volatility
TECY vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TECY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 94.73% | -79.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 94.73% | -79.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 94.73% | -79.09% |
TECY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TECY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TECY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
TECY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, less than ARMW's 52.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 52.39% | 16.38% |
TECY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF | 11.46% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TECY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TECY.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 52.39%, compared with 11.46% for TECY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TECY and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for TECY and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer