PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TECW.L vs. KROP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TECW.L vs. KROP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (TECW.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TECW.L is traded in GBP, while KROP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KROP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECW.L achieves a 16.43% return, which is significantly higher than KROP.L's 13.35% return.


TECW.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.20%
6M
19.12%
YTD
16.43%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
25.71%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
19.41%
ALL TIME*
16.22%

KROP.L

1D
-1.05%
1M
-0.98%
6M
5.70%
YTD
13.35%
1Y
8.22%
3Y*
-3.40%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECW.L vs. KROP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TECW.L
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF
16.43%13.84%36.32%46.35%-35.06%
KROP.L
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.42%-0.05%-6.73%-26.39%-15.16%

Correlation

The correlation between TECW.L and KROP.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.29

The correlation between TECW.L and KROP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TECW.L vs. KROP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECW.L
TECW.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TECW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TECW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP.L
KROP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
KROP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECW.L vs. KROP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (TECW.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TECW.LKROP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.10

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

0.97

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

1.80

+2.38

TECW.L vs. KROP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the KROP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECW.L and KROP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TECW.L vs. KROP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECW.L drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, smaller than the maximum KROP.L drawdown of -50.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECW.L and KROP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECW.LKROP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-50.76%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.66%

-8.40%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.26%

-26.17%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-39.88%

+31.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-34.57%

+26.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

4.55%

+2.35%

Volatility

TECW.L vs. KROP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (TECW.L) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L) at 4.80%. This indicates that TECW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECW.LKROP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

4.80%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.55%

13.22%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

16.76%

+4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.58%

20.20%

+4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.45%

20.20%

+3.25%

TECW.L vs. KROP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TECW.L vs. KROP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TECW.L nor KROP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TECW.L and KROP.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TECW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TECW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.L.

TECW.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while KROP.L tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TECW.L and 0.50% for KROP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TECW.L and KROP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer