TECW.L vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (TECW.L) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
TECW.L and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TECW.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both TECW.L and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TECW.L or SMH.
Key characteristics
| TECW.L | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.42% | 32.13% |
| 1Y Return | 31.83% | 59.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.60 | 1.71 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.63% | 33.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.78% | -95.73% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.66% | -17.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TECW.L and SMH is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TECW.L vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TECW.L achieves a 17.42% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 32.13% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TECW.L vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TECW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TECW.L vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (TECW.L) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TECW.L vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
TECW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECW.L SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.45% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
TECW.L vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TECW.L drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECW.L and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TECW.L vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (TECW.L) is 7.04%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 12.41%. This indicates that TECW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.