PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TECI.TO vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF (TECI.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TECI.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECI.TO achieves a 47.65% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 22.94% return.


TECI.TO

1D
0.60%
1M
16.61%
YTD
47.65%
6M
43.71%
1Y
75.88%
3Y*
36.50%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQM

1D
0.21%
1M
12.88%
YTD
22.94%
6M
19.29%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
30.39%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TECI.TO
TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF
47.65%21.96%28.21%40.27%-45.55%-3.80%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
22.94%15.31%36.48%51.60%-27.71%-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TECI.TO and QQQM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2021

0.68

The correlation between TECI.TO and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TECI.TO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECI.TO
TECI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TECI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TECI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF (TECI.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TECI.TOQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.40

3.59

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.15

11.44

+7.70

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECI.TO and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TECI.TOQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

2.82

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.97

-0.55

Drawdowns

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECI.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.94%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -31.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECI.TO and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECI.TOQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.94%

-31.71%

-23.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-12.27%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.77%

-22.52%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.84%

-7.58%

-15.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

3.84%

+0.14%

Volatility

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF (TECI.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.41%. This indicates that TECI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECI.TOQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

4.41%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.55%

11.79%

+8.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

15.61%

+9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

20.58%

+8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.42%

20.48%

+8.94%

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

TECI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%
TECI.TO
TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF
0.07%0.10%0.43%0.55%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TECI.TO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TECI.TO.

TECI.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. TECI.TO tracks Solactive Global Technology Innovators Index (CA NTR), while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: TD and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TECI.TO and 0.15% for QQQM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TECI.TO and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer