TECI.TO vs. QQQM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TECI.TO (TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TECI.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Technology Innovators Index (CA NTR), while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TECI.TO returned 29.01%/yr vs 26.31%/yr for QQQM. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TECI.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF (TECI.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TECI.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECI.TO achieves a 33.90% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 16.99% return.

TECI.TO

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -7.25%
• 6M: 30.99%
• YTD: 33.90%
• 1Y: 53.97%
• 3Y*: 29.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.21%

QQQM

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -3.11%
• 6M: 15.27%
• YTD: 16.99%
• 1Y: 28.57%
• 3Y*: 26.31%
• 5Y*: 17.13%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	CA$1.48B	CA$1.32B	CA$1.68B
TECI.TO TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF	CA$209.40K	CA$264.18K	CA$285.88K

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TECI.TO TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF	33.90%	21.96%	28.21%	40.27%	-45.55%	-5.69%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.99%	15.33%	36.33%	51.32%	-28.24%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TECI.TO and QQQM is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2021	0.65

The correlation between TECI.TO and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TECI.TO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TECI.TO

TECI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 68
TECI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TECI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
TECI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TECI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
TECI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 55
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF (TECI.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TECI.TO	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.48	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.06	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.26	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	2.35	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.49	6.86	+2.63

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECI.TO and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECI.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECI.TO and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TECI.TO	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.35%	-32.26%	-23.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.18%	-12.21%	-5.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.77%	-22.57%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.18%	-6.16%	-7.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.81%	-7.49%	-15.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.26%	4.17%	+1.09%

Volatility

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF (TECI.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.80%. This indicates that TECI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TECI.TO	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.96%	6.80%	+3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.59%	16.14%	+9.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.04%	19.41%	+10.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.08%	23.53%	+6.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.08%	23.26%	+6.82%

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TECI.TO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

TECI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than QQQM's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.45%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%
TECI.TO TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF	0.07%	0.10%	0.43%	0.55%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TECI.TO and QQQM in my portfolio?

TECI.TO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TECI.TO or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TECI.TO or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TECI.TO.

What is the main difference between TECI.TO and QQQM?

TECI.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. TECI.TO tracks Solactive Global Technology Innovators Index (CA NTR), while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: TD and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TECI.TO and 0.15% for QQQM.