TECI.TO vs. QMVP.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF (TECI.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO).
TECI.TO and QMVP.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TECI.TO is a passively managed fund by TD that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Technology Innovators Index (CA NTR). It was launched on Nov 23, 2021. QMVP.TO is a passively managed fund by Hamilton that tracks the performance of the Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. It was launched on Jan 20, 2026. Both TECI.TO and QMVP.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TECI.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TECI.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TECI.TO TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF | -1.29% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | -6.64% |
Returns By Period
TECI.TO
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- 35.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMVP.TO
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TECI.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TECI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QMVP.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TECI.TO vs. QMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TECI.TO
QMVP.TO
TECI.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF (TECI.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TECI.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TECI.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -1.33 | +1.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between TECI.TO and QMVP.TO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TECI.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
TECI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than QMVP.TO's 0.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECI.TO TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.77% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TECI.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TECI.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.94%, which is greater than QMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECI.TO and QMVP.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TECI.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.94% | -12.77% | -42.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -8.10% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | -6.31% | -17.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | — | — |
Volatility
TECI.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TECI.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.06% | 22.65% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 22.65% | +6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 22.65% | +6.77% |