PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEC vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEC vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TEC having a 13.69% return and HDV slightly higher at 14.07%.


TEC

1D
-2.94%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
13.69%
6M
12.37%
1Y
33.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDV

1D
1.33%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.08%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEC vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TEC and HDV is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025

-0.12

TEC vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEC
HDV

Technology

72.3%
0.2%

Communication Services

12.5%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.2%

Healthcare

3.3%
22.6%

Utilities

1.2%
8.1%

Financial Services

0.9%
4.7%

Industrials

0.8%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.5%

Energy

-

20.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

TEC
72.3%
HDV
0.2%

Communication Services

TEC
12.5%
HDV
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TEC
8.9%
HDV
9.2%

Healthcare

TEC
3.3%
HDV
22.6%

Utilities

TEC
1.2%
HDV
8.1%

Financial Services

TEC
0.9%
HDV
4.7%

Industrials

TEC
0.8%
HDV
3.5%

Basic Materials

TEC

-

HDV
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

TEC

-

HDV
24.5%

Energy

TEC

-

HDV
20.2%

Real Estate

TEC

-

HDV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEC vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEC
TEC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
TEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEC vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TECHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

4.09

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

11.19

-5.35

TEC vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEC and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEC vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEC drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEC and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-37.04%

+19.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.50%

-5.18%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.74%

-1.35%

-5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-3.08%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

1.89%

+3.88%

Volatility

TEC vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.64%. This indicates that TEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

3.64%

+5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.19%

7.61%

+9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.68%

9.93%

+11.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

12.81%

+9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

15.73%

+6.24%

TEC vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEC vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

TEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.90%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
TEC
Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEC and HDV have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEC has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to HDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEC dropped -17.50% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 1-year performance, TEC leads with 33.60% vs 21.06% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEC has performed better with a 33.60% return vs 21.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TEC.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for TEC.

TEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TEC and 0.08% for HDV.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEC and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer