TDV vs. XLK
TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TDV tracks the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDV returned 13.78%/yr vs 23.44%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDV charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
TDV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDV achieves a 22.23% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 34.34% return.
TDV
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 22.23%
- 6M
- 19.99%
- 1Y
- 34.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 16.63%
- YTD
- 34.34%
- 6M
- 33.10%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 33.46%
- 5Y*
- 23.44%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
TDV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 22.23% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 3.67% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 34.34% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 7.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDV and XLK is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between TDV and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDV vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDV
XLK
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TDV
XLK
Industrials
TDV
XLK
Financial Services
TDV
XLK
-
Basic Materials
TDV
-
XLK
-
Communication Services
TDV
-
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
TDV
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
TDV
-
XLK
-
Energy
TDV
-
XLK
Healthcare
TDV
-
XLK
-
Real Estate
TDV
-
XLK
-
Utilities
TDV
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
TDV
XLK
TDV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.49 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 4.04 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.54 | 13.55 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 3.09 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.95 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.41 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
TDV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDV drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDV and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -82.05% | +49.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -15.92% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.51% | -25.66% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -33.56% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -2.54% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -34.95% | +29.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 4.74% | -1.98% |
Volatility
TDV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) is 5.05%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that TDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 7.27% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 16.76% | -4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.25% | 20.86% | -3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 24.90% | -4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.20% | 24.49% | -1.29% |
TDV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDV has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than XLK's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDV and XLK have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to TDV (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDV dropped -32.78% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 23.44% vs 13.78% for TDV. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.44% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.
TDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.40% for XLK.
TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for TDV and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDV and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer