PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDV vs. FAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDV vs. FAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDV achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly lower than FAI's 28.90% return.


TDV

1D
0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
12.41%
YTD
17.24%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*

FAI

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.70%
6M
25.51%
YTD
28.90%
1Y
49.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDV vs. FAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDV and FAI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.76

The correlation between TDV and FAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDV vs. FAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDV
TDV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDV vs. FAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDVFAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.30

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.64

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

7.77

-1.17

TDV vs. FAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the FAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDV and FAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDV vs. FAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDV drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than FAI's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDV and FAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDVFAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-27.82%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-18.84%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-8.44%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-5.48%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

6.38%

-3.28%

Volatility

TDV vs. FAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) is 8.45%, while First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a volatility of 11.84%. This indicates that TDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDVFAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

11.84%

-3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.35%

23.56%

-8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.15%

27.99%

-8.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

31.12%

-10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.32%

31.12%

-7.80%

TDV vs. FAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDV has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FAI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDV vs. FAI - Dividend Comparison

TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
1.04%1.09%1.16%1.16%1.67%1.08%1.10%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDV and FAI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAI has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to TDV (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDV dropped -32.78% vs FAI's -27.82%.

On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 49.94% vs 21.54% for TDV. On fees, FAI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 8.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 49.94% return vs 21.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.

TDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index, while FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for TDV and 0.65% for FAI.

FAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDV and FAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer