TDV vs. CRTC
TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TDV tracks the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TDV returned 32.41% vs 18.63% for CRTC. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDV charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.
Performance
TDV vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDV achieves a 21.00% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 5.11% return.
TDV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 21.00%
- 6M
- 18.86%
- 1Y
- 32.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- —
CRTC
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDV vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 21.00% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 7.45% |
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 5.11% | 18.69% | 18.05% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDV and CRTC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between TDV and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDV vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDV
CRTC
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TDV
CRTC
Financial Services
TDV
CRTC
Industrials
TDV
CRTC
Basic Materials
TDV
-
CRTC
Communication Services
TDV
-
CRTC
Consumer Cyclical
TDV
-
CRTC
Consumer Defensive
TDV
-
CRTC
Energy
TDV
-
CRTC
Healthcare
TDV
-
CRTC
Real Estate
TDV
-
CRTC
Utilities
TDV
-
CRTC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDV vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank
TDV
CRTC
TDV vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDV | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 2.07 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.25 | 7.27 | +3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDV vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDV drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDV and CRTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDV | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -19.07% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -9.05% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -4.43% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -2.16% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.57% | +0.32% |
Volatility
TDV vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 5.70%. This indicates that TDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDV | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 5.70% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 10.64% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 13.54% | +4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 15.88% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 15.88% | +7.39% |
TDV vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDV has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDV vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison
TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than CRTC's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 0.90% | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 0.95% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDV and CRTC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDV has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to CRTC (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDV dropped -32.78% vs CRTC's -19.07%.
On 1-year performance, TDV leads with 32.41% vs 18.63% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TDV has performed better with a 32.41% return vs 18.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.
TDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.90% for CRTC.
TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for TDV and 0.35% for CRTC.
TDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDV and CRTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer