PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTT vs. USDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTT vs. USDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTT achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than USDX's 2.59% return.


TDTT

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.20%
6M
1.26%
YTD
1.34%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
2.65%
10Y*
3.01%

USDX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.31%
6M
2.43%
YTD
2.59%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDTT vs. USDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.34%6.67%4.18%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
2.59%6.25%6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TDTT and USDX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTT vs. USDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

USDX
USDX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
USDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDTT vs. USDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDTTUSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.77

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

6.87

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

43.69

-34.27

TDTT vs. USDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the USDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTT and USDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDTT vs. USDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, which is greater than USDX's maximum drawdown of -0.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and USDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTTUSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-0.94%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.97%

-0.94%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.06%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-0.06%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.15%

+0.19%

Volatility

TDTT vs. USDX - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) at 0.76%. This indicates that TDTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTTUSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.76%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.42%

1.94%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94%

2.07%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

1.75%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

1.75%

+1.63%

TDTT vs. USDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than USDX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDTT vs. USDX - Dividend Comparison

TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, less than USDX's 6.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
5.15%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
6.87%5.88%4.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDTT and USDX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDTT has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to USDX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTT dropped -6.97% vs USDX's -0.94%.

On 1-year performance, USDX leads with 6.41% vs 3.17% for TDTT. On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USDX has performed better with a 6.41% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.

USDX has the higher dividend yield at 6.87%, compared with 5.15% for TDTT.

TDTT is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while USDX is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTT and 0.98% for USDX.

USDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTT and USDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer