PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTT vs. SDCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTT vs. SDCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF (SDCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTT achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than SDCP's 1.06% return.


TDTT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
3.11%

SDCP

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.18%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDTT vs. SDCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.81%6.67%3.96%1.98%
SDCP
Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF
1.06%5.37%5.24%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TDTT and SDCP is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023

0.39

The correlation between TDTT and SDCP shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTT vs. SDCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SDCP
SDCP Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SDCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCP Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDTT vs. SDCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF (SDCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDTTSDCPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.74

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

5.33

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.59

19.90

-3.31

TDTT vs. SDCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the SDCP Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTT and SDCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDTTSDCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

3.02

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

2.66

-1.97

Drawdowns

TDTT vs. SDCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, which is greater than SDCP's maximum drawdown of -1.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and SDCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTTSDCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-1.00%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-0.82%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.10%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-0.18%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.22%

+0.06%

Volatility

TDTT vs. SDCP - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF (SDCP) at 0.30%. This indicates that TDTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTTSDCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.30%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.21%

0.84%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

1.46%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

2.04%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

2.04%

+1.34%

TDTT vs. SDCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDTT vs. SDCP - Dividend Comparison

TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than SDCP's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SDCP
Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF
5.23%5.16%5.25%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.54%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDTT and SDCP have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDTT has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to SDCP (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTT dropped -6.97% vs SDCP's -1.00%.

On 1-year performance, TDTT leads with 4.65% vs 4.38% for SDCP. On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SDCP has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDTT has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SDCP.

SDCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 4.54% for TDTT.

TDTT is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SDCP is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTT and 0.35% for SDCP.

SDCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTT and SDCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer