PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTT vs. MBSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTT vs. MBSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTT achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than MBSD's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TDTT has outperformed MBSD with an annualized return of 3.04%, while MBSD has yielded a comparatively lower 1.28% annualized return.


TDTT

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.10%
6M
1.06%
YTD
1.36%
1Y
2.49%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*
3.04%
ALL TIME*
2.20%

MBSD

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.64%
6M
-0.19%
YTD
0.05%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
1.28%
ALL TIME*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$182.32K$254.46K$254.18K
$4.63M$4.98M$5.09M

TDTT vs. MBSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.36%6.67%3.96%4.40%-4.58%5.49%6.84%5.74%0.25%0.43%
MBSD
FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund
0.05%7.12%2.30%4.46%-9.49%-1.40%5.43%6.05%0.32%0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TDTT and MBSD is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2014

0.41

The correlation between TDTT and MBSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTT vs. MBSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

MBSD
MBSD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MBSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSD Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSD Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDTT vs. MBSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDTTMBSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.14

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.23

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

3.24

+3.63

TDTT vs. MBSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the MBSD Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTT and MBSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDTT vs. MBSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum MBSD drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and MBSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTTMBSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-14.36%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.97%

-2.17%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

-4.25%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.97%

-14.01%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.97%

-14.36%

+7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.56%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-2.79%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.83%

-0.47%

Volatility

TDTT vs. MBSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) is 0.55%, while FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that TDTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTTMBSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

0.89%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.44%

2.59%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83%

3.35%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

5.17%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

4.27%

-0.89%

TDTT vs. MBSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MBSD's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TDTT vs. MBSD - Dividend Comparison

TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than MBSD's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBSD
FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund
4.17%4.23%3.91%3.39%3.03%2.41%2.78%3.42%3.22%3.30%3.02%3.46%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
5.61%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDTT and MBSD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBSD has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to TDTT (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTT dropped -6.97% vs MBSD's -14.36%.

On 10-year performance, TDTT leads with 3.04% vs 1.28% for MBSD. On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TDTT has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDTT has performed better with a 3.04% return vs 1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MBSD.

TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 4.17% for MBSD.

TDTT is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while MBSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. TDTT tracks iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS, while MBSD tracks ICE BofA Constrained Duration US Mortgage Backed Securities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTT and 0.20% for MBSD.

TDTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTT and MBSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer