PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTF vs. LDRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTF vs. LDRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTF achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than LDRI's 1.63% return.


TDTF

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.12%
6M
0.53%
YTD
1.01%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
2.82%
ALL TIME*
2.23%

LDRI

1D
0.05%
1M
0.10%
6M
1.35%
YTD
1.63%
1Y
2.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$135.90K$196.88K$205.69K
$3.31M$3.20M$4.11M

TDTF vs. LDRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDTF and LDRI is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.62

The correlation between TDTF and LDRI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTF vs. LDRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDTF
TDTF Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TDTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTF Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRI
LDRI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LDRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDTF vs. LDRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDTFLDRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.33

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

4.62

-3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

11.56

-8.35

TDTF vs. LDRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTF Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the LDRI Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTF and LDRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDTF vs. LDRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTF drawdown since its inception was -12.02%, which is greater than LDRI's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTF and LDRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTFLDRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-0.85%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.58%

-0.63%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.33%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-0.21%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

0.25%

+0.38%

Volatility

TDTF vs. LDRI - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) has a higher volatility of 0.71% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) at 0.45%. This indicates that TDTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTFLDRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

0.45%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

1.21%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

1.83%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

2.25%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

2.25%

+2.82%

TDTF vs. LDRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRI's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TDTF vs. LDRI - Dividend Comparison

TDTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than LDRI's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDRI
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF
5.02%4.23%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDTF
FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
5.84%4.58%3.98%3.97%7.60%4.55%1.13%1.80%2.60%2.20%1.51%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDTF and LDRI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDTF has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to LDRI (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTF dropped -12.02% vs LDRI's -0.85%.

On 1-year performance, LDRI leads with 2.90% vs 2.01% for TDTF. On fees, LDRI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, LDRI has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LDRI has performed better with a 2.90% return vs 2.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for TDTF.

TDTF has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 5.02% for LDRI.

TDTF tracks iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS, while LDRI tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTF and 0.10% for LDRI.

LDRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTF and LDRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer