TDSC vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDSC is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. TDSC is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TDSC returned 10.55%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for ISCMF. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDSC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

TDSC vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSC achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

TDSC

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 8.11%
• 1Y: 16.68%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 2.67%
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSC vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF	8.99%	6.56%	7.10%	7.63%	-11.76%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	19.65%	3.13%	-9.58%	-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSC and ISCMF is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022	0.00

Return for Risk

TDSC vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSC

TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 61
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 78
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSC vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TDSC	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.76	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	3.18	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	2.31	-1.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	5.53	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.61	11.85	-0.25

TDSC vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSC and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TDSC vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDSC	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.51%	-25.42%	+3.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.35%	-5.69%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.24%	-7.62%	-6.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-5.26%	+2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-13.35%	+4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	2.65%	-1.21%

Volatility

TDSC vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) is 3.67%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that TDSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDSC	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	5.11%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.31%	15.45%	-8.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.42%	17.84%	-8.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.38%	14.29%	-3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.27%	14.29%	-4.02%

TDSC vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDSC vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF	2.05%	2.92%	2.06%	2.06%	1.76%	1.11%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDSC and ISCMF in my portfolio?

TDSC and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDSC or ISCMF?

ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to TDSC (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSC dropped -21.51% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, TDSC or ISCMF?

On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 16.78% vs 10.55% for TDSC. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, TDSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDSC or ISCMF?

Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDSC or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDSC or ISCMF?

TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

What is the main difference between TDSC and ISCMF?

TDSC is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.