PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSC vs. HTUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TDSC vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TDSC vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
3.10%6.56%7.10%7.63%-19.67%14.81%-0.11%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
-3.85%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%24.29%14.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSC achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's -3.85% return.


TDSC

1D
1.72%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
3.10%
6M
3.92%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*

HTUS

1D
3.72%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
0.02%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TDSC vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TDSC vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSC
TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSC vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDSCHTUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

0.79

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

1.37

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.99

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.23

6.79

-4.56

TDSC vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is comparable to the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSC and HTUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDSCHTUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.79

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.71

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.51

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between TDSC and HTUS is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TDSC vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than HTUS's 12.37% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
2.17%2.92%2.06%2.06%1.76%1.11%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
12.37%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%

Drawdowns

TDSC vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and HTUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSCHTUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.51%

-47.50%

+25.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-17.90%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-24.41%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-5.29%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-4.11%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.61%

+0.78%

Volatility

TDSC vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) is 3.72%, while Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that TDSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TDSCHTUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

6.36%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.10%

9.24%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

21.90%

-9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.32%

18.99%

-8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.29%

21.38%

-11.09%