TDSC vs. HTEC
TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDSC is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. TDSC is actively managed, while HTEC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDSC returned 3.05%/yr vs -5.22%/yr for HTEC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDSC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
TDSC vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDSC achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's -0.69% return.
TDSC
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- —
HTEC
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- 1Y
- 28.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- -5.22%
- 10Y*
- —
TDSC vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 9.75% | 6.56% | 7.10% | 7.63% | -19.67% | 14.81% | -0.50% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -0.69% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 27.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDSC and HTEC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between TDSC and HTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSC vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
TDSC
HTEC
TDSC vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDSC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 1.75 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.83 | 4.21 | +8.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDSC vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.51% | -57.53% | +36.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -16.31% | +10.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | -28.67% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | -56.10% | +34.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -31.69% | +29.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -28.99% | +19.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 6.77% | -5.34% |
Volatility
TDSC vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) is 3.63%, while ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that TDSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 7.04% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 15.69% | -8.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.38% | 20.86% | -11.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 24.49% | -14.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.28% | 25.47% | -15.19% |
TDSC vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSC vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than HTEC's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDSC and HTEC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTEC has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to TDSC (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSC dropped -21.51% vs HTEC's -57.53%.
On 5-year performance, TDSC leads with 3.05% vs -5.22% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, TDSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDSC has performed better with a 3.05% return vs -5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSC.
TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.99% for HTEC.
TDSC is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 0.68% for HTEC.
TDSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDSC and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer