PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSB vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDSB vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 36.23% return.


TDSB

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.64%
YTD
4.54%
6M
4.50%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*

PDBC

1D
0.39%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
36.23%
6M
36.27%
1Y
45.46%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSB vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
4.54%12.95%3.56%4.71%-16.83%8.44%-1.17%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
36.23%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSB and PDBC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDSB vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSB
TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSB vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDSBPDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

6.35

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

13.39

-0.64

TDSB vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSB and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDSBPDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.46

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.65

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.23

+0.08

Drawdowns

TDSB vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSBPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-49.52%

+29.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-7.19%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-13.95%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

-27.63%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-4.55%

+3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-23.21%

+14.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

3.41%

-2.24%

Volatility

TDSB vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) is 1.64%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that TDSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDSBPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

6.20%

-4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

15.78%

-10.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.98%

18.61%

-12.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.32%

19.12%

-11.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

17.78%

-10.25%

TDSB vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDSB vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than PDBC's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.82%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.13%1.93%3.50%2.77%1.81%1.75%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDSB and PDBC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBC has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to TDSB (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSB dropped -19.56% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

On 5-year performance, PDBC leads with 12.39% vs 2.16% for TDSB. On fees, PDBC is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TDSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PDBC is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSB.

PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 2.13% for TDSB.

TDSB is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 0.58% for PDBC.

TDSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDSB and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer