TDSB vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TDSB (Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDSB is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TDSB returned 14.83% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. TDSB charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

TDSB vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.63% return.

TDSB

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 4.54%
• 6M: 4.50%
• 1Y: 14.83%
• 3Y*: 8.77%
• 5Y*: 2.16%
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSB vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF	4.54%	12.95%	-0.64%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSB and CSHP is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	-0.02

TDSB vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TDSB	CSHP
Utilities	33.1%	-
Healthcare	32.8%	-
Technology	19.6%	-
Communication Services	5.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	-
Industrials	1.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.4%	-
Energy	0.2%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	0.1%
Real Estate	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

TDSB vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSB

TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 73
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSB vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDSB	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	11.91	-9.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	31.26	-27.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	7.44	-5.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	65.71	-62.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	432.16	-419.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDSB vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSB and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDSB	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	11.91	-9.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	10.75	-10.44

Drawdowns

TDSB vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDSB	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.56%	-0.08%	-19.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.64%	-0.06%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	0.00%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.12%	-0.00%	-9.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	0.01%	+1.16%

Volatility

TDSB vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that TDSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDSB	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.64%	0.07%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.01%	0.24%	+4.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.98%	0.33%	+5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.32%	0.40%	+6.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.53%	0.40%	+7.13%

TDSB vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDSB vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF	2.13%	1.93%	3.50%	2.77%	1.81%	1.75%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDSB and CSHP in my portfolio?

TDSB and CSHP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDSB or CSHP?

TDSB has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSB dropped -19.56% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, TDSB or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, TDSB leads with 14.83% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDSB or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, TDSB has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDSB or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDSB or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 2.13% for TDSB.

What is the main difference between TDSB and CSHP?

TDSB is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.