TDSB vs. ASGM
TDSB (Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF) and ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDSB charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for ASGM.
Performance
TDSB vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than ASGM's 22.52% return.
TDSB
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 4.54%
- 6M
- 4.50%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- —
ASGM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 24.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSB vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 4.54% | 7.32% |
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 22.52% | 11.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDSB and ASGM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSB vs. ASGM — Risk / Return Rank
TDSB
ASGM
TDSB vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDSB | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDSB | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 2.95 | -2.63 |
Drawdowns
TDSB vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and ASGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSB | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.56% | -6.62% | -12.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.53% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -1.22% | -7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | — | — |
Volatility
TDSB vs. ASGM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSB | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.98% | 15.67% | -9.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 15.67% | -8.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 15.67% | -8.14% |
TDSB vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSB vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison
TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than ASGM's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 3.69% | 4.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 2.13% | 1.93% | 3.50% | 2.77% | 1.81% | 1.75% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDSB and ASGM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.
ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.13% for TDSB.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 0.86% for ASGM.
Find the right allocation for TDSB and ASGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer