TDSA vs. QTAC
TDSA (Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF) and QTAC (Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. TDSA is passively managed, while QTAC is actively managed. TDSA charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for QTAC.
Performance
TDSA vs. QTAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDSA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAC
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 14.39%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSA vs. QTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% |
QTAC Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF | 4.99% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSA vs. QTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA) and Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF (QTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDSA | QTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.33 | — |
Drawdowns
TDSA vs. QTAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QTAC drawdown of -16.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSA and QTAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSA | QTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -16.56% | +16.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.62% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -6.70% | +6.70% |
Volatility
TDSA vs. QTAC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSA | QTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 24.15% | -24.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 24.15% | -24.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 24.15% | -24.15% |
TDSA vs. QTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSA has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAC's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSA vs. QTAC - Dividend Comparison
TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QTAC Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% |
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TDSA is cheaper at 0.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDSA is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for QTAC.
QTAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for TDSA.
They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Q3 Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TDSA and 1.78% for QTAC.
Find the right allocation for TDSA and QTAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer