TDIV vs. VT
TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TDIV returned 18.57%/yr vs 12.93%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
TDIV vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 21.17% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 18.57%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.93% annualized return.
TDIV
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 21.17%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 28.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.57%
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
TDIV vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 21.17% | 25.27% | 24.43% | 36.71% | -22.13% | 29.49% | 17.55% | 33.27% | -3.18% | 21.95% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDIV and VT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012 | 0.86 |
The correlation between TDIV and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDIV vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDIV
VT
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TDIV
VT
Communication Services
TDIV
VT
Industrials
TDIV
VT
Basic Materials
TDIV
-
VT
Consumer Cyclical
TDIV
-
VT
Consumer Defensive
TDIV
-
VT
Energy
TDIV
-
VT
Financial Services
TDIV
-
VT
Healthcare
TDIV
-
VT
Real Estate
TDIV
-
VT
Utilities
TDIV
-
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDIV vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
TDIV
VT
TDIV vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDIV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.68 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.78 | 11.67 | -1.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDIV vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDIV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.97% | -50.27% | +18.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -9.67% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.00% | -16.51% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -26.38% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.97% | -34.24% | +2.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -1.92% | -6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -7.01% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 2.22% | +1.52% |
Volatility
TDIV vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a higher volatility of 9.90% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.26%. This indicates that TDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDIV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.90% | 5.26% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.62% | 11.01% | +4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 13.38% | +6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 16.15% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 17.27% | +3.69% |
TDIV vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDIV vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDIV and VT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDIV has higher volatility (9.90%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.57% vs 12.93% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.57% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.20% for TDIV.
TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while VT is Global Equities. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDIV and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer