TDIV vs. STHH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds - TDIV tracks the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index while STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TDIV returned 53.63% vs 209.77% for STHH. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.

Performance

TDIV vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 30.57% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 209.56% return.

TDIV

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: 15.82%
• YTD: 30.57%
• 6M: 28.79%
• 1Y: 53.63%
• 3Y*: 33.27%
• 5Y*: 19.29%
• 10Y*: 19.34%

STHH

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 45.30%
• YTD: 209.56%
• 6M: 210.55%
• 1Y: 209.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	30.57%	39.16%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	209.56%	16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and STHH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	0.68

The correlation between TDIV and STHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TDIV vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV

TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 83
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 89
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDIV	STHH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	4.20	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	4.20	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.60	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.02	6.23	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.64	14.15	+1.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDIV vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is lower than the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDIV	STHH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	4.20	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	4.44	-3.56

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum STHH drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and STHH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDIV	STHH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.97%	-33.89%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.74%	-33.89%	+23.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	0.00%	-1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-10.46%	+5.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	14.90%	-11.46%

Volatility

TDIV vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) is 6.86%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 20.33%. This indicates that TDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDIV	STHH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.86%	20.33%	-13.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.91%	36.77%	-22.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.47%	50.39%	-31.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.67%	49.44%	-28.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.85%	49.44%	-28.59%

TDIV vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDIV vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than STHH's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.55%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	1.12%	1.40%	1.59%	1.74%	2.51%	1.76%	2.07%	2.27%	2.97%	2.27%	2.45%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDIV and STHH in my portfolio?

TDIV and STHH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDIV or STHH?

STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to TDIV (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs STHH's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, TDIV or STHH?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 209.77% vs 53.63% for TDIV. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDIV or STHH?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 209.77% return vs 53.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDIV or STHH?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDIV or STHH?

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.55% for STHH.

What is the main difference between TDIV and STHH?

TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.19% for STHH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.