PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TDIV having a 20.64% return and RDVY slightly lower at 20.30%. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has outperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 17.38%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively lower 16.28% annualized return.


TDIV

1D
3.50%
1M
4.31%
6M
19.61%
YTD
20.64%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
27.65%
5Y*
16.92%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
15.98%

RDVY

1D
1.77%
1M
3.82%
6M
15.85%
YTD
20.30%
1Y
31.93%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
16.28%
ALL TIME*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$89.60M$82.66M$85.30M
$13.49M$12.95M$15.18M

TDIV vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
20.64%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
20.30%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and RDVY is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.78

The correlation between TDIV and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDIV vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDIV
RDVY

Technology

83.2%
19.4%

Communication Services

15.0%
4.2%

Industrials

1.9%
12.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.8%

Energy

-

2.8%

Financial Services

-

38.9%

Healthcare

-

5.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

TDIV
83.2%
RDVY
19.4%

Communication Services

TDIV
15.0%
RDVY
4.2%

Industrials

TDIV
1.9%
RDVY
12.5%

Basic Materials

TDIV

-

RDVY

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDIV

-

RDVY
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

TDIV

-

RDVY
2.8%

Energy

TDIV

-

RDVY
2.8%

Financial Services

TDIV

-

RDVY
38.9%

Healthcare

TDIV

-

RDVY
5.6%

Real Estate

TDIV

-

RDVY

-

Utilities

TDIV

-

RDVY
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDIV vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDIVRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.55

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

14.89

-9.90

TDIV vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIVRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-40.60%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.34%

-9.04%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-19.11%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-25.32%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

-40.60%

+8.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

0.00%

-9.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-4.95%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

2.15%

+3.82%

Volatility

TDIV vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.91%. This indicates that TDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIVRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

3.91%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.62%

11.47%

+5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.93%

14.70%

+6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.18%

18.94%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

21.04%

-0.01%

TDIV vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than RDVY's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.81%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.30%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV and RDVY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to RDVY (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 17.38% vs 16.28% for RDVY. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.81% for RDVY.

TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer