TDI vs. FDT
TDI (Touchstone Dynamic International ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TDI is actively managed, while FDT is passively managed. Over the past year, TDI returned 42.61% vs 55.05% for FDT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
TDI vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDI achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 25.50% return.
TDI
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 22.24%
- 1Y
- 42.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDT
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 55.05%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
TDI vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TDI Touchstone Dynamic International ETF | 18.78% | 43.12% | 6.39% | 4.12% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 25.50% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDI and FDT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between TDI and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDI vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDI
FDT
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
TDI
FDT
Technology
TDI
FDT
Industrials
TDI
FDT
Energy
TDI
FDT
Healthcare
TDI
FDT
Basic Materials
TDI
FDT
Communication Services
TDI
FDT
Consumer Cyclical
TDI
FDT
Utilities
TDI
FDT
Consumer Defensive
TDI
FDT
Real Estate
TDI
-
FDT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDI vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
TDI
FDT
TDI vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Dynamic International ETF (TDI) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.54 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 4.13 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.18 | 16.12 | -1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 3.00 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 0.40 | +1.35 |
Drawdowns
TDI vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDI drawdown since its inception was -14.99%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDI and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.99% | -46.10% | +31.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.09% | -13.41% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -1.59% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -10.78% | +8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 3.43% | -0.42% |
Volatility
TDI vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Dynamic International ETF (TDI) is 6.02%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that TDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 7.23% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.88% | 15.91% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 18.42% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 18.23% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 18.52% | -1.68% |
TDI vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDI vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
TDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than FDT's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.84% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
TDI Touchstone Dynamic International ETF | 1.63% | 1.94% | 3.39% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TDI and FDT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to TDI (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDI dropped -14.99% vs FDT's -46.10%.
On 1-year performance, FDT leads with 55.05% vs 42.61% for TDI. On fees, TDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TDI has been the lower-risk option at 6.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDT has performed better with a 55.05% return vs 42.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.63% for TDI.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TDI and 0.80% for FDT.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDI and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer