PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDAQ vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDAQ vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDAQ achieves a 20.13% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 129.31% return.


TDAQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
10.56%
YTD
20.13%
6M
19.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NRGU

1D
2.53%
1M
-6.67%
YTD
129.31%
6M
97.01%
1Y
156.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDAQ vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDAQ and NRGU is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025

-0.20

TDAQ vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDAQ
NRGU

Technology

54.2%

-

Communication Services

15.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Energy

0.6%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TDAQ
54.2%
NRGU

-

Communication Services

TDAQ
15.5%
NRGU

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDAQ
12.2%
NRGU

-

Consumer Defensive

TDAQ
7.6%
NRGU

-

Healthcare

TDAQ
4.2%
NRGU

-

Industrials

TDAQ
2.8%
NRGU

-

Utilities

TDAQ
1.4%
NRGU

-

Basic Materials

TDAQ
1.2%
NRGU

-

Energy

TDAQ
0.6%
NRGU
100.0%

Financial Services

TDAQ
0.2%
NRGU

-

Real Estate

TDAQ
0.1%
NRGU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDAQ vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDAQ

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDAQ vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDAQ vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDAQNRGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

0.45

+2.10

Drawdowns

TDAQ vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDAQ drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDAQ and NRGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDAQNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-57.50%

+46.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-20.91%

+20.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-25.42%

+23.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.96%

Volatility

TDAQ vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDAQNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

75.15%

-58.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

89.15%

-72.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

89.15%

-72.01%

TDAQ vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDAQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDAQ vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

TDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TDAQ and NRGU have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDAQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDAQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.

TDAQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.10%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

TDAQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for TDAQ and 0.95% for NRGU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDAQ and NRGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer