PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDAQ vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDAQ vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDAQ achieves a 20.13% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.90% return.


TDAQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
10.56%
YTD
20.13%
6M
19.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDAQ vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDAQ and BUCK is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025

0.05

TDAQ vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDAQ
BUCK

Technology

54.2%

-

Communication Services

15.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
100.0%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TDAQ
54.2%
BUCK

-

Communication Services

TDAQ
15.5%
BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDAQ
12.2%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

TDAQ
7.6%
BUCK

-

Healthcare

TDAQ
4.2%
BUCK

-

Industrials

TDAQ
2.8%
BUCK

-

Utilities

TDAQ
1.4%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

TDAQ
1.2%
BUCK

-

Energy

TDAQ
0.6%
BUCK

-

Financial Services

TDAQ
0.2%
BUCK
100.0%

Real Estate

TDAQ
0.1%
BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDAQ vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDAQ

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDAQ vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDAQ vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDAQBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

1.47

+1.08

Drawdowns

TDAQ vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDAQ drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDAQ and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDAQBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-5.43%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.04%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-0.49%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

TDAQ vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDAQBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

3.14%

+14.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

3.49%

+13.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

3.49%

+13.65%

TDAQ vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDAQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDAQ vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

TDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
TDAQ
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF
10.10%4.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDAQ and BUCK have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for TDAQ.

TDAQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.10%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

TDAQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for TDAQ and 0.35% for BUCK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDAQ and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer