TCV vs. RZV
TCV (Towle Value ETF) and RZV (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. TCV is actively managed, while RZV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RZV.
Performance
TCV vs. RZV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCV achieves a 24.97% return, which is significantly higher than RZV's 23.67% return.
TCV
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- YTD
- 24.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RZV
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- YTD
- 23.67%
- 1Y
- 34.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
TCV vs. RZV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TCV Towle Value ETF | 24.97% | 2.99% |
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 23.67% | 11.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCV and RZV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCV vs. RZV — Risk / Return Rank
TCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RZV
TCV vs. RZV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Towle Value ETF (TCV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCV | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCV vs. RZV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCV drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum RZV drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCV and RZV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCV | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -77.11% | +64.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -2.39% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -13.54% | +10.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility
TCV vs. RZV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCV | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 20.56% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 24.24% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 26.89% | -5.63% |
TCV vs. RZV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RZV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCV vs. RZV - Dividend Comparison
TCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than RZV's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 0.86% | 0.63% | 1.03% | 2.03% | 1.02% | 0.46% | 1.24% |
TCV Towle Value ETF | 0.58% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCV and RZV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RZV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RZV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.
RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.58% for TCV.
They also come from different issuers: Towle and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TCV and 0.35% for RZV.
Find the right allocation for TCV and RZV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer