TCOM vs. NEM
TCOM (Trip.com Group Limited) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. TCOM operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, TCOM returned 0.25%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for NEM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TCOM vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCOM achieves a -40.48% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, TCOM has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 0.25%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.
TCOM
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- 6M
- -43.43%
- YTD
- -40.48%
- 1Y
- -30.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 0.25%
NEM
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -12.19%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 60.16%
- 3Y*
- 32.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
TCOM vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCOM Trip.com Group Limited | -40.48% | 5.24% | 90.67% | 4.68% | 39.72% | -27.01% | 0.57% | 23.95% | -38.64% | 10.25% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | -4.15% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCOM and NEM is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2003 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
TCOM:
$26.95B
NEM:
$101.73B
TCOM:
CN¥45.41
NEM:
$7.15
TCOM:
6.39
NEM:
13.33
TCOM:
0.04
NEM:
0.35
TCOM:
3.12
NEM:
4.07
TCOM:
CN¥64.48B
NEM:
$17.23B
TCOM:
CN¥51.79B
NEM:
$8.97B
TCOM:
CN¥39.20B
NEM:
$13.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCOM vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
TCOM
NEM
TCOM vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCOM | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.23 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 2.09 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 4.81 | -6.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCOM vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCOM drawdown since its inception was -76.34%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCOM and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCOM | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.34% | -81.30% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.54% | -29.39% | -20.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.54% | -36.57% | -12.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.54% | -62.40% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.96% | -62.40% | -9.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.80% | -27.47% | -18.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.89% | -41.34% | +13.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.98% | 12.73% | +12.25% |
Volatility
TCOM vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) has a higher volatility of 16.28% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 14.14%. This indicates that TCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCOM | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.28% | 14.14% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.02% | 37.29% | -6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.00% | 47.74% | -9.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.47% | 38.15% | +11.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.42% | 35.73% | +8.69% |
Dividends
TCOM vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
TCOM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.07% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
TCOM Trip.com Group Limited | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TCOM vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trip.com Group Limited and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TCOM and NEM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCOM has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to NEM (14.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCOM dropped -76.34% vs NEM's -81.30%.
NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCOM and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer