PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCOM vs. IAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TCOM vs. IAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCOM achieves a -40.48% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's -7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, TCOM has underperformed IAG with an annualized return of 0.25%, while IAG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


TCOM

1D
3.31%
1M
-9.69%
6M
-43.43%
YTD
-40.48%
1Y
-30.88%
3Y*
6.23%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
0.25%

IAG

1D
-0.97%
1M
-5.08%
6M
-10.98%
YTD
-7.10%
1Y
117.30%
3Y*
78.58%
5Y*
39.12%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCOM vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
-40.48%5.24%90.67%4.68%39.72%-27.01%0.57%23.95%-38.64%10.25%
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
-7.10%219.57%103.95%-1.94%-17.57%-14.71%-1.61%1.36%-36.88%51.43%

Correlation

The correlation between TCOM and IAG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2003

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TCOM:

$26.95B

IAG:

$8.85B

EPS

TCOM:

CN¥45.41

IAG:

$1.73

PE Ratio

TCOM:

6.39

IAG:

8.87

PEG Ratio

TCOM:

0.04

IAG:

0.05

PS Ratio

TCOM:

3.12

IAG:

2.62

PB Ratio

TCOM:

1.20

IAG:

2.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

TCOM:

CN¥64.48B

IAG:

$3.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TCOM:

CN¥51.79B

IAG:

$1.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

TCOM:

CN¥39.20B

IAG:

$1.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCOM vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCOM
TCOM Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IAG
IAG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCOM vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCOMIAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.31

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

3.06

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

6.68

-7.92

TCOM vs. IAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCOM Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the IAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCOM and IAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCOM vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCOM drawdown since its inception was -76.34%, smaller than the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCOM and IAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCOMIAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.34%

-95.55%

+19.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.54%

-39.60%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.54%

-39.60%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.54%

-73.69%

+24.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.96%

-86.46%

+14.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.80%

-37.65%

-8.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.89%

-56.11%

+28.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.98%

18.10%

+6.88%

Volatility

TCOM vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) is 16.28%, while IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a volatility of 18.59%. This indicates that TCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCOMIAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.28%

18.59%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.02%

50.34%

-19.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.00%

62.39%

-24.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.47%

60.72%

-11.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.42%

58.63%

-14.21%

Dividends

TCOM vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither TCOM nor IAG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
0.00%0.00%
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
0.00%0.42%

Financials

TCOM vs. IAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trip.com Group Limited and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
16.11B
1.03B
(TCOM) Total Revenue
(IAG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TCOM values in CNY, IAG values in USD

TCOM vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trip.com Group Limited and IAMGOLD Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
79.5%
55.4%
Portfolio components
TCOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a gross profit of 12.80B and revenue of 16.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.5%.

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

TCOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported an operating income of 3.92B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

TCOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TCOM and IAG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAG has higher volatility (18.59%) compared to TCOM (16.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCOM dropped -76.34% vs IAG's -95.55%.

IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCOM and IAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer