TCMSX vs. NBGNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TCMSX (Voya Small Cap Growth Fund) and NBGNX (Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TCMSX returned 14.85%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for NBGNX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCMSX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NBGNX.

Performance

TCMSX vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCMSX achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly higher than NBGNX's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, TCMSX has outperformed NBGNX with an annualized return of 14.85%, while NBGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.

TCMSX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 6.11%
• YTD: 18.13%
• 6M: 17.07%
• 1Y: 46.45%
• 3Y*: 21.24%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: 14.85%

NBGNX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 6.50%
• 6M: 4.16%
• 1Y: 7.41%
• 3Y*: 6.32%
• 5Y*: 2.65%
• 10Y*: 8.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCMSX vs. NBGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TCMSX Voya Small Cap Growth Fund	18.13%	14.32%	18.46%	20.32%	-23.60%	18.45%	27.99%	33.27%	-6.04%	24.78%
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund	6.50%	-4.70%	9.04%	15.57%	-19.49%	18.07%	24.86%	29.47%	-6.91%	15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TCMSX and NBGNX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005	0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between TCMSX and NBGNX has dropped to 0.70 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TCMSX vs. NBGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCMSX

TCMSX Risk / Return Rank: 63
TCMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TCMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TCMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
TCMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
TCMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

NBGNX

NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 7
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCMSX vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCMSX	NBGNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	0.56	+1.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	0.96	+2.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.11	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	0.84	+2.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.89	2.25	+10.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCMSX vs. NBGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the NBGNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCMSX and NBGNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCMSX	NBGNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	0.56	+1.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.14	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.45	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.65	-0.16

Drawdowns

TCMSX vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.98%, which is greater than NBGNX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMSX and NBGNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCMSX	NBGNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.98%	-51.75%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.86%	-10.77%	-6.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.74%	-27.51%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.60%	-28.33%	-6.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.29%	-34.53%	-4.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-9.29%	+8.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.77%	-7.15%	-4.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	3.99%	+0.13%

Volatility

TCMSX vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) at 4.06%. This indicates that TCMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCMSX	NBGNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	4.06%	+3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.80%	11.31%	+6.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.99%	16.04%	+6.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.35%	19.66%	+4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.64%	20.22%	+3.42%

TCMSX vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCMSX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCMSX vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison

TCMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than NBGNX's 15.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund	15.36%	16.36%	2.15%	3.03%	11.05%	10.92%	3.84%	5.82%	12.24%	13.89%	11.21%	18.52%
TCMSX Voya Small Cap Growth Fund	4.72%	5.57%	10.53%	0.00%	0.00%	20.02%	6.69%	1.40%	14.82%	16.10%	0.00%	16.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCMSX and NBGNX in my portfolio?

TCMSX and NBGNX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCMSX or NBGNX?

TCMSX has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to NBGNX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCMSX dropped -55.98% vs NBGNX's -51.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TCMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.