PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TCMSX vs. PNSAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


TCMSXPNSAX
YTD Return27.92%34.30%
1Y Return48.62%52.45%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.59%-1.40%
5Y Return (Ann)7.46%11.03%
10Y Return (Ann)3.57%10.83%
Sharpe Ratio2.442.74
Sortino Ratio3.283.67
Omega Ratio1.411.45
Calmar Ratio1.291.40
Martin Ratio14.3817.93
Ulcer Index3.40%2.95%
Daily Std Dev20.09%19.31%
Max Drawdown-60.13%-61.15%
Current Drawdown-7.90%-5.34%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between TCMSX and PNSAX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

TCMSX vs. PNSAX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TCMSX achieves a 27.92% return, which is significantly lower than PNSAX's 34.30% return. Over the past 10 years, TCMSX has underperformed PNSAX with an annualized return of 3.57%, while PNSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.92%
19.46%
TCMSX
PNSAX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TCMSX vs. PNSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCMSX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than PNSAX's 1.23% expense ratio.


PNSAX
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for PNSAX: current value at 1.23% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.23%
Expense ratio chart for TCMSX: current value at 0.93% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.93%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TCMSX vs. PNSAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCMSX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TCMSX, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.44
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TCMSX, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TCMSX, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TCMSX, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TCMSX, currently valued at 14.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.38
PNSAX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PNSAX, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.74
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PNSAX, currently valued at 3.67, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PNSAX, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PNSAX, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PNSAX, currently valued at 17.93, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0017.93

TCMSX vs. PNSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the PNSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCMSX and PNSAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.44
2.74
TCMSX
PNSAX

Dividends

TCMSX vs. PNSAX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TCMSX nor PNSAX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TCMSX vs. PNSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.13%, roughly equal to the maximum PNSAX drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMSX and PNSAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.90%
-5.34%
TCMSX
PNSAX

Volatility

TCMSX vs. PNSAX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) at 5.94%. This indicates that TCMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.53%
5.94%
TCMSX
PNSAX