TCMSX vs. FCPGX

In the year-to-date period, TCMSX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 19.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TCMSX has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 3.19%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.74% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TCMSX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TCMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCMSX and FCPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TCMSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.

The maximum TCMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.13%, roughly equal to the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMSX and FCPGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) has a higher volatility of 13.04% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) at 6.35%. This indicates that TCMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.