TCGAX vs. PUDZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund (TCGAX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX).
TCGAX is managed by Timothy Plan. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. PUDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010.
Performance
TCGAX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCGAX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCGAX Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund | -0.09% | 10.54% | 4.29% | 6.59% | -12.86% | 7.61% | 7.71% | 14.78% | -9.25% | 8.29% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 9.23% | 13.40% | 8.61% | 3.26% | -2.76% | 18.49% | 4.84% | 16.29% | -9.20% | 6.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCGAX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, TCGAX has underperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 3.75%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.92% annualized return.
TCGAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 8.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
PUDZX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TCGAX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCGAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TCGAX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank
TCGAX
PUDZX
TCGAX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund (TCGAX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCGAX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.98 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 2.57 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.40 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 2.35 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 13.15 | -7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCGAX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.98 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.88 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.72 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.52 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCGAX and PUDZX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TCGAX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison
TCGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than PUDZX's 8.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCGAX Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund | 1.15% | 1.14% | 3.45% | 1.65% | 5.35% | 4.01% | 2.56% | 3.64% | 2.47% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 7.45% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 8.17% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 3.66% | 9.10% | 13.00% | 4.94% | 3.40% | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
TCGAX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCGAX drawdown since its inception was -40.54%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCGAX and PUDZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCGAX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.54% | -21.53% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -8.20% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.77% | -17.98% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.35% | -21.53% | +1.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -2.44% | -2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -5.31% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.47% | +0.15% |
Volatility
TCGAX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison
Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund (TCGAX) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 2.60%. This indicates that TCGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCGAX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 2.60% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.11% | 6.24% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.87% | 9.70% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.69% | 10.58% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.28% | 9.70% | -1.42% |