TCBIX vs. PUTW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TCBIX (The Covered Bridge Fund) and PUTW (WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund) are both Derivative Income funds. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TCBIX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for PUTW.

Performance

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) and WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TCBIX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.59%
• 6M: 7.01%
• YTD: 10.92%
• 1Y: 19.02%
• 3Y*: 9.71%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: 7.57%
• ALL TIME*: 7.25%

PUTW

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TCBIX The Covered Bridge Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TCBIX The Covered Bridge Fund	10.92%	12.61%	4.09%	4.09%	0.05%	18.21%	-1.71%	18.73%	-3.93%	9.66%
PUTW WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund	0.00%	-2.80%	17.19%	14.01%	-11.11%	20.92%	1.67%	13.55%	-8.07%	9.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TCBIX and PUTW is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.55

The correlation between TCBIX and PUTW shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TCBIX vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCBIX

TCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
TCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
TCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

PUTW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) and WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCBIX	PUTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.58	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TCBIX	PUTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TCBIX	PUTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.77%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.20%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.51%	—	—

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCBIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison

TCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, while PUTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PUTW WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund	0.00%	4.16%	11.99%	7.63%	2.16%	0.00%	1.43%	1.47%	5.49%	3.33%	2.27%	0.00%
TCBIX The Covered Bridge Fund	8.34%	8.24%	7.47%	7.34%	8.09%	6.00%	4.70%	6.77%	11.55%	7.32%	7.32%	5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCBIX and PUTW in my portfolio?

TCBIX and PUTW have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.