TCBIX vs. PUTW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TCBIX (The Covered Bridge Fund) and PUTW (WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund) are both Derivative Income funds. Over the past 10 years, TCBIX returned 7.93%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for PUTW. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TCBIX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for PUTW.

Performance

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCBIX achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than PUTW's 4.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TCBIX having a 7.93% annualized return and PUTW not far ahead at 8.32%.

TCBIX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 6M: 11.87%
• 1Y: 22.84%
• 3Y*: 11.46%
• 5Y*: 6.53%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

PUTW

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 4.45%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 19.36%
• 3Y*: 13.69%
• 5Y*: 10.02%
• 10Y*: 8.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TCBIX The Covered Bridge Fund	10.93%	12.61%	4.09%	4.09%	0.05%	18.21%	-1.71%	18.73%	-3.93%	9.66%
PUTW WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund	4.45%	14.45%	17.18%	15.53%	-10.11%	20.94%	1.65%	13.55%	-7.16%	10.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TCBIX and PUTW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016	0.59

The correlation between TCBIX and PUTW shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TCBIX vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCBIX

TCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
TCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
TCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
TCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

PUTW

PUTW Risk / Return Rank: 58
PUTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PUTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PUTW Omega Ratio Rank: 64
PUTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
PUTW Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCBIX	PUTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	2.20	+0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.05	3.06	+0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.44	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	2.74	+1.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.19	13.14	+2.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the PUTW Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCBIX and PUTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCBIX	PUTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	2.20	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.83	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.63	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.65	-0.09

Drawdowns

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCBIX drawdown since its inception was -28.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PUTW drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCBIX and PUTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCBIX	PUTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.94%	-28.40%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.26%	-7.15%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.73%	-15.26%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.07%	-16.56%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.94%	-28.40%	-0.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.09%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-3.44%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	1.49%	+0.03%

Volatility

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Volatility Comparison

The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) at 0.86%. This indicates that TCBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCBIX	PUTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.29%	0.86%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.92%	7.00%	-1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.66%	8.86%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.16%	12.13%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.55%	13.22%	+0.33%

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCBIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCBIX vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison

TCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, less than PUTW's 12.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PUTW WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund	12.03%	13.18%	11.99%	8.94%	3.27%	0.00%	1.43%	1.47%	6.46%	3.52%	2.27%	0.00%
TCBIX The Covered Bridge Fund	7.98%	8.24%	7.47%	7.34%	8.09%	6.00%	4.70%	6.77%	11.55%	7.32%	7.32%	5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCBIX and PUTW in my portfolio?

TCBIX and PUTW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCBIX or PUTW?

TCBIX has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to PUTW (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCBIX dropped -28.94% vs PUTW's -28.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TCBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.