PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAN vs. CIFU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAN vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 21Shares Canton Network ETF (TCAN) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TCAN

1D
-4.17%
1M
-5.76%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIFU

1D
-8.45%
1M
0.06%
YTD
56.02%
6M
50.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAN vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TCAN and CIFU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAN vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Canton Network ETF (TCAN) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TCAN vs. CIFU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCAN vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAN drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAN and CIFU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCANCIFUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-77.20%

+63.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.90%

-28.16%

+15.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-42.40%

+36.50%

Volatility

TCAN vs. CIFU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCANCIFUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.51%

205.28%

-140.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.51%

205.28%

-140.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.51%

205.28%

-140.77%

TCAN vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAN vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither TCAN nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAN and CIFU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TCAN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TCAN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

TCAN and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

TCAN is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TCAN and 1.50% for CIFU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAN and CIFU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer