PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAL vs. NVII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAL vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAL achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 15.50% return.


TCAL

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-2.97%
1Y
-1.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVII

1D
-3.35%
1M
6.25%
YTD
15.50%
6M
18.61%
1Y
62.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAL vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TCAL and NVII is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAL vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAL
TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAL vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCALNVIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.30

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

3.39

-3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

8.64

-9.34

TCAL vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAL and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCALNVIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

1.83

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

2.04

-2.14

Drawdowns

TCAL vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAL drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum NVII drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAL and NVII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCALNVIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-18.47%

+11.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-18.47%

+11.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.92%

-8.54%

+2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-5.50%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

7.24%

-4.57%

Volatility

TCAL vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) is 2.46%, while REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 12.22%. This indicates that TCAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCALNVIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

12.22%

-9.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.08%

25.24%

-18.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

34.40%

-25.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.25%

34.54%

-23.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.25%

34.54%

-23.29%

TCAL vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAL vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

TCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.96%, less than NVII's 51.55% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TCAL and NVII have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVII has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to TCAL (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAL dropped -7.24% vs NVII's -18.47%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 62.33% vs -1.87% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 62.33% return vs -1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 51.55%, compared with 11.96% for TCAL.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TCAL and 0.99% for NVII.

NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAL and NVII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer