PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAF vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAF vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


TCAF

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.54%
YTD
6.51%
6M
6.60%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAF vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
6.51%15.45%20.93%8.40%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and MTUM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023

0.80

The correlation between TCAF and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

TCAF vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TCAF
MTUM

Technology

33.7%
44.4%

Healthcare

17.3%
6.9%

Communication Services

11.4%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
3.6%

Utilities

8.6%
1.6%

Financial Services

6.0%
10.4%

Industrials

4.6%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
3.3%

Energy

2.6%
3.5%

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.8%

Technology

TCAF
33.7%
MTUM
44.4%

Healthcare

TCAF
17.3%
MTUM
6.9%

Communication Services

TCAF
11.4%
MTUM
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TCAF
10.6%
MTUM
3.6%

Utilities

TCAF
8.6%
MTUM
1.6%

Financial Services

TCAF
6.0%
MTUM
10.4%

Industrials

TCAF
4.6%
MTUM
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

TCAF
3.3%
MTUM
3.3%

Energy

TCAF
2.6%
MTUM
3.5%

Basic Materials

TCAF
0.1%
MTUM
1.7%

Real Estate

TCAF
0.1%
MTUM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAF vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAF vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCAFMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

3.64

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

14.50

-7.22

TCAF vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAF and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCAFMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.20

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.85

+0.41

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAFMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-34.08%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-11.54%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

0.00%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-6.21%

+4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.89%

-0.07%

Volatility

TCAF vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) is 2.43%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that TCAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCAFMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

7.68%

-5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

16.46%

-7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

19.04%

-7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

20.60%

-6.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

21.03%

-7.09%

TCAF vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAF vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.47%0.50%0.43%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAF and MTUM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to TCAF (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 1-year performance, MTUM leads with 41.76% vs 20.51% for TCAF. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TCAF has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 41.76% return vs 20.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for TCAF.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.47% for TCAF.

TCAF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TCAF and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAF and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer