PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAF vs. GRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAF vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than GRNY's 9.85% return.


TCAF

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
4.37%
6M
5.06%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRNY

1D
1.15%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
9.85%
6M
8.71%
1Y
27.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAF vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
4.37%15.45%-1.49%
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF
9.85%24.05%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and GRNY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024

0.82

The correlation between TCAF and GRNY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAF vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNY
GRNY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAF vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCAFGRNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.30

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

6.95

-1.31

TCAF vs. GRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the GRNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAF and GRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum GRNY drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and GRNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAFGRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-24.18%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-11.63%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-2.02%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-3.99%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.83%

-0.97%

Volatility

TCAF vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) is 3.60%, while Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that TCAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCAFGRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.55%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

13.31%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

18.03%

-6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

23.21%

-9.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

23.21%

-9.23%

TCAF vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNY's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAF vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, while GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.48%0.50%0.43%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAF and GRNY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRNY has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to TCAF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs GRNY's -24.18%.

On 1-year performance, GRNY leads with 27.52% vs 17.29% for TCAF. On fees, TCAF is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, TCAF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GRNY has performed better with a 27.52% return vs 17.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCAF is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNY.

TCAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for GRNY.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Tidal ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TCAF and 0.75% for GRNY.

GRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAF and GRNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer