TCAF vs. GRNY
TCAF (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF) and GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCAF returned 17.29% vs 27.52% for GRNY. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCAF charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNY.
Performance
TCAF vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than GRNY's 9.85% return.
TCAF
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- 17.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNY
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCAF vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 4.37% | 15.45% | -1.49% |
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 9.85% | 24.05% | -0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCAF and GRNY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between TCAF and GRNY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCAF vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank
TCAF
GRNY
TCAF vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCAF | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 2.30 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 6.95 | -1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCAF vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum GRNY drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and GRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCAF | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -24.18% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -11.63% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -2.02% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -3.99% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.83% | -0.97% |
Volatility
TCAF vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) is 3.60%, while Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that TCAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCAF | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 5.55% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 13.31% | -4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 18.03% | -6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 23.21% | -9.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 23.21% | -9.23% |
TCAF vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCAF vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison
TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, while GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.43% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCAF and GRNY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRNY has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to TCAF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs GRNY's -24.18%.
On 1-year performance, GRNY leads with 27.52% vs 17.29% for TCAF. On fees, TCAF is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, TCAF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GRNY has performed better with a 27.52% return vs 17.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TCAF is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNY.
TCAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for GRNY.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Tidal ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TCAF and 0.75% for GRNY.
GRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCAF and GRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer