PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAAX vs. BWBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAAX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAAX achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's 1.80% return.


TCAAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.02%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.47%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
5.50%

BWBIX

1D
1.38%
1M
4.79%
YTD
1.80%
6M
7.71%
1Y
13.39%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAAX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TCAAX
Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund
4.97%11.66%8.27%11.69%-14.96%6.52%10.12%14.81%-3.55%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
1.80%10.23%19.62%25.77%-32.58%14.76%62.85%36.41%-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAAX and BWBIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.84

The correlation between TCAAX and BWBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAAX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAAX
TCAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TCAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BWBIX
BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAAX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCAAXBWBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

0.94

+1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

1.49

+2.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.18

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.13

+1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.07

3.74

+9.34

TCAAX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAAX and BWBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCAAXBWBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

0.94

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.22

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.54

+0.07

Drawdowns

TCAAX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAAX drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, smaller than the maximum BWBIX drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAAX and BWBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAAXBWBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.82%

-39.14%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-11.65%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-21.59%

+14.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.33%

-39.14%

+18.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-11.73%

+7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

3.53%

-2.40%

Volatility

TCAAX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) is 1.99%, while Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that TCAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCAAXBWBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

3.13%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

10.94%

-5.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.22%

14.35%

-8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.00%

21.07%

-13.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.20%

23.14%

-15.94%

TCAAX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAAX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAAX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

TCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than BWBIX's 7.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
7.47%7.61%0.77%0.06%3.21%3.75%1.24%3.51%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCAAX
Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund
5.91%6.19%3.55%2.52%1.87%3.74%3.82%5.15%3.99%1.77%1.67%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAAX and BWBIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWBIX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to TCAAX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAAX dropped -30.82% vs BWBIX's -39.14%.

TCAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAAX and BWBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer