TBUX vs. EDIV
TBUX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. TBUX is actively managed, while EDIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TBUX returned 5.85%/yr vs 16.98%/yr for EDIV. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBUX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EDIV.
Performance
TBUX vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBUX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than EDIV's 4.31% return.
TBUX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDIV
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
TBUX vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.69% | 5.37% | 6.38% | 6.39% | -0.13% | -0.22% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.31% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBUX and EDIV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.15 |
The correlation between TBUX and EDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TBUX vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TBUX
EDIV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
TBUX
EDIV
Communication Services
TBUX
EDIV
Consumer Cyclical
TBUX
EDIV
Consumer Defensive
TBUX
EDIV
Healthcare
TBUX
EDIV
Industrials
TBUX
EDIV
Basic Materials
TBUX
EDIV
Utilities
TBUX
EDIV
Energy
TBUX
EDIV
Financial Services
TBUX
EDIV
Real Estate
TBUX
EDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBUX vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank
TBUX
EDIV
TBUX vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBUX | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +13.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.15 | 1.18 | +1.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 48.80 | 1.13 | +47.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 185.24 | 3.45 | +181.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBUX | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.27 | 0.94 | +6.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.88 | 0.16 | +3.72 |
Drawdowns
TBUX vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBUX drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBUX and EDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBUX | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -53.36% | +51.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -10.36% | +10.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.33% | -13.84% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -5.97% | +5.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -19.35% | +19.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 3.39% | -3.36% |
Volatility
TBUX vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) is 0.22%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that TBUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBUX | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 4.14% | -3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.46% | 10.31% | -9.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67% | 12.42% | -11.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.07% | 13.86% | -12.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.07% | 17.50% | -16.43% |
TBUX vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBUX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBUX vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison
TBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than EDIV's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.59% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.67% | 5.39% | 4.66% | 2.58% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBUX and EDIV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDIV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to TBUX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBUX dropped -1.79% vs EDIV's -53.36%.
On 3-year performance, EDIV leads with 16.98% vs 5.85% for TBUX. On fees, TBUX is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, TBUX has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 16.98% return vs 5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBUX is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 4.48% for TBUX.
TBUX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for TBUX and 0.49% for EDIV.
TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.27 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBUX and EDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer