PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLU vs. TPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLU vs. TPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) and Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLU achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than TPZ's 6.91% return.


TBLU

1D
1.93%
1M
1.77%
6M
-1.46%
YTD
4.97%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.11%

TPZ

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.48%
6M
3.90%
YTD
6.91%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
8.30%
ALL TIME*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$70.51K$63.53K$112.51K
$293.05K$219.78K$220.84K

TBLU vs. TPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
4.97%11.82%8.54%20.95%-25.99%28.93%15.74%38.72%-12.80%20.81%
TPZ
Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF
6.91%5.67%53.88%20.72%2.44%29.31%-27.84%15.61%-16.12%-2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLU and TPZ is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2017

0.34

The correlation between TBLU and TPZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TBLU vs. TPZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TBLU
TPZ

Industrials

64.2%
4.6%

Utilities

24.6%
43.6%

Basic Materials

7.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%

-

Technology

0.7%

-

Energy

0.6%
51.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

TBLU
64.2%
TPZ
4.6%

Utilities

TBLU
24.6%
TPZ
43.6%

Basic Materials

TBLU
7.9%
TPZ

-

Consumer Defensive

TBLU
1.0%
TPZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

TBLU
0.8%
TPZ

-

Technology

TBLU
0.7%
TPZ

-

Energy

TBLU
0.6%
TPZ
51.8%

Communication Services

TBLU

-

TPZ

-

Financial Services

TBLU

-

TPZ

-

Healthcare

TBLU

-

TPZ

-

Real Estate

TBLU

-

TPZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLU vs. TPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBLU
TBLU Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

TPZ
TPZ Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBLU vs. TPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) and Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBLUTPZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.06

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

0.60

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

1.38

-0.95

TBLU vs. TPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the TPZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLU and TPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBLU vs. TPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLU drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, smaller than the maximum TPZ drawdown of -78.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLU and TPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLUTPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-78.17%

+40.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-6.63%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-17.78%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

-17.78%

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-5.57%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-11.85%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

2.99%

+3.56%

Volatility

TBLU vs. TPZ - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) and Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) have volatilities of 4.96% and 4.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLUTPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

4.75%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

11.20%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

14.15%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

17.67%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

27.73%

-8.82%

TBLU vs. TPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TPZ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBLU vs. TPZ - Dividend Comparison

TBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than TPZ's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
3.37%3.31%1.34%1.46%1.64%1.55%1.42%1.58%1.35%1.32%0.00%0.00%
TPZ
Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF
3.49%3.99%5.88%8.99%9.52%4.77%8.80%8.84%9.41%7.28%6.88%9.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLU and TPZ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLU has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to TPZ (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLU dropped -37.58% vs TPZ's -78.17%.

On 5-year performance, TPZ leads with 18.69% vs 3.96% for TBLU. On fees, TBLU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TPZ has performed better with a 18.69% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBLU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.

TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 3.37% for TBLU.

TBLU is categorized as Water Equities, while TPZ is Infrastructure Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TBLU and 0.85% for TPZ.

TPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLU and TPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer