PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLU vs. TPYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLU vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLU achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.07% return.


TBLU

1D
0.17%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-4.11%
1Y
-1.51%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*

TPYP

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
20.07%
6M
19.62%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
25.01%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLU vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
-1.99%11.82%8.54%20.95%-25.99%28.93%15.74%38.72%-12.80%20.21%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
20.07%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLU and TPYP is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2017

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between TBLU and TPYP has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TBLU vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TBLU
TPYP

Industrials

65.8%

-

Utilities

24.7%
22.0%

Basic Materials

7.1%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%

-

Technology

0.5%

-

Energy

0.5%
68.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

TBLU
65.8%
TPYP

-

Utilities

TBLU
24.7%
TPYP
22.0%

Basic Materials

TBLU
7.1%
TPYP
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

TBLU
0.8%
TPYP

-

Consumer Cyclical

TBLU
0.7%
TPYP

-

Technology

TBLU
0.5%
TPYP

-

Energy

TBLU
0.5%
TPYP
68.8%

Communication Services

TBLU

-

TPYP

-

Financial Services

TBLU

-

TPYP
2.4%

Healthcare

TBLU

-

TPYP

-

Real Estate

TBLU

-

TPYP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLU vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLU
TBLU Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLU vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLUTPYPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.28

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

3.09

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.28

8.34

-8.62

TBLU vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLU Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLU and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLUTPYPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

1.61

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

1.02

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.43

+0.07

Drawdowns

TBLU vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLU drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLU and TPYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLUTPYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-51.91%

+14.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-6.84%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-13.17%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

-17.96%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.65%

-5.27%

-6.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-7.89%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

2.56%

+2.90%

Volatility

TBLU vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) is 4.35%, while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that TBLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLUTPYPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

5.67%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

10.29%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

13.16%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

17.45%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

21.94%

-2.98%

TBLU vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TBLU and TPYP have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

TBLU vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

TBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than TPYP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
3.37%3.31%1.34%1.46%1.64%1.55%1.42%1.58%1.35%1.32%0.00%0.00%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.25%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLU and TPYP have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPYP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to TBLU (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLU dropped -37.58% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

On 5-year performance, TPYP leads with 17.73% vs 3.78% for TBLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, TBLU has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBLU and TPYP have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

TBLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 3.25% for TPYP.

TBLU is categorized as Water Equities, while TPYP is Energy Equities. TBLU tracks Tortoise Global Water ESG Net Total Return Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index.

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLU and TPYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer