TBLU vs. TNUK
TBLU (Tortoise Global Water Fund) and TNUK (Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBLU is a Water Equities fund tracking the Tortoise Global Water ESG Net Total Return Index, while TNUK is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise. TBLU is passively managed, while TNUK is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TBLU charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TNUK.
Performance
TBLU vs. TNUK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBLU achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than TNUK's 1.23% return.
TBLU
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- —
TNUK
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBLU vs. TNUK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TBLU Tortoise Global Water Fund | 2.38% | -0.29% |
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 1.23% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLU and TNUK is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.53 |
TBLU vs. TNUK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TBLU
TNUK
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
TBLU
TNUK
Utilities
TBLU
TNUK
Basic Materials
TBLU
TNUK
Consumer Defensive
TBLU
TNUK
-
Consumer Cyclical
TBLU
TNUK
-
Technology
TBLU
TNUK
Energy
TBLU
TNUK
Communication Services
TBLU
-
TNUK
-
Financial Services
TBLU
-
TNUK
-
Healthcare
TBLU
-
TNUK
-
Real Estate
TBLU
-
TNUK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLU vs. TNUK — Risk / Return Rank
TBLU
TNUK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBLU vs. TNUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) and Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF (TNUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBLU | TNUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBLU vs. TNUK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLU drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, which is greater than TNUK's maximum drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLU and TNUK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLU | TNUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.58% | -21.57% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -15.48% | +7.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -8.58% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | — | — |
Volatility
TBLU vs. TNUK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLU | TNUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 34.56% | -19.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 34.56% | -17.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 34.56% | -15.61% |
TBLU vs. TNUK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBLU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TNUK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBLU vs. TNUK - Dividend Comparison
TBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, while TNUK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLU Tortoise Global Water Fund | 4.24% | 3.31% | 1.34% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.55% | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.35% | 1.32% |
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLU and TNUK have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBLU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBLU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TNUK.
TBLU has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 0.00% for TNUK.
TBLU is categorized as Water Equities, while TNUK is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TBLU and 0.75% for TNUK.
Find the right allocation for TBLU and TNUK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer